Much has been made about the Interim Iraq Report in the news over the last twenty four hours. I have actually read the report and here is what it says, the Iraqi government has made satisfactory progress in the following areas: constitutional review, forming semi-autonomous regions, establishing an Independent High Elections commission, establishing various committees in support of the Baghdad Security Plan, providing three brigades of Iraqi soldiers for Baghdad operations, making sure that Baghdad does not become a safe haven for terrorists, reducing the level of sectarian violence, establishing joint security stations in Baghdad, protecting the rights of minority political parties and allocating resources for reconstruction projects. The Iraqi government has failed in several key areas including de-Ba’athification, distributing oil revenues, establishing a military that can act independently, coordinating with coalition forces, and setting dates for local and regional elections.
Many are taking this report as a reason why we should withdraw from Iraq. It is obvious that the Iraqi government is semi-functional at best and completely impotent at worst. For those who would like the United States to withdraw and leave the Iraqi people to their most assuredly uncertain fate, I would like to offer a short history lesson.
In 1780, the United States won their independence from the Empire of Great Britain. At that time, the United States was a very small country, made up of thirteen independent states with no effective central government. We had a government under the Articles of Confederation, but it was weak and impotent with no power to tax, raise an army or even enforce it’s own laws. The British refused to abandon their forts between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River, Virginia, Maryland and Delaware were engaged in open conflict over the fishing grounds in the Chesapeake Bay, frontier settlements were under constant attack, the Spanish controlled the Mississippi and there was an open rebellion in Massachusetts. It looked at though the new republic was doomed to failure. Keep in mind that Americans had, at this point, nearly 200 years of experience in rational self-government. A constitutional convention was called in 1787 to address these and other issues and finally our current Constitution was adopted in 1789. It took nine long years of near chaos and anarchy for the United States to develop a workable and stable central government even with long experience in self government. Should we expect the Iraqis to do any better?