Peace In Our Time
Yes, that is what Neville Chamberlain thought he had achieved with the Munich accords. He honestly believed in the promises that Hitler made and that “Der Fuhrer” was really a man of his word. Of course, Chamberlain also said, “In war, whichever side may call itself the victor, there are no winners, but all are losers.” It was he who in September 1939 had to announce that a state of war existed between the British Empire and the Third Reich. Thank God there was a Winston Churchill who understood that there are some things worth fighting for.
My point? Harry Reid has already gone on record in stating that the United States has “lost” the war in Iraq. During the Democratic Presidential debate last night several of the candidates, not the least of which was Dennis Kucinich, stated that they would, if elected, end the war in Iraq. Kucinich even went on to say that the United States could not interfere in “every civil war in the world”. I would like to contrast that with another two Chamberlain quotes:
“How horrible, fantastic, incredible, it is that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas-masks here because of a quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing” and “However much we may sympathize with a small nation confronted by a big and powerful neighbours, we cannot in all circumstances undertake to involve the whole British Empire in a war simply on her account.” In other words, the current Democratic leadership, like Chamberlain, is willing to throw away freedom and democracy and the safety of entire nations for peace in our time. But I believe that if we retreat, if we “cut and run” there will be no peace.
Six bloody years and millions of deaths and the destruction of whole countries later Chamberlain was proved wrong. Let’s hope that it doesn’t take the same to prove the Democratic party wrong.

