Impeach Bush!

Filed under: Political stuff — Doug at 3:42 pm on Saturday, March 25, 2006

Go ahead, try! There are many out there, including some members of Congress who would like to begin impeachment proceedings against the President. It appears that their hackles are raised by the following beliefs: the Presidents lied to us about “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq, there was “no connection” between Saddam’s regime and al Queda and that the use of warrantless serches is un-Constitutional and unnecessary.

OK, let me state the facts clearly and in small words so that even the most thickheaded idiot can understand. Iraq had “weapons of mass destruction”. Biological and chemical weapons were used in the Iran/Iraq War, against the Kurds in the north of Iraq and in the first Gulf War. Period. That is a fact. Furthermore, according to the book Saddam’s Secrets, former Iraqi general Georges Sada alleges that Iraq’s remaining chemical and biological weapons were smuggled into Syria just before the American invasion. So, let me restate the facts, Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. The President did not lie about it.

Iraq had no ties to terrorism and specifically al Queda. Really? You mean Saddam offering a $25,000 bounty to the families of suicide bombers is not a tie to terrorism? What about allowing terrorist training camps to be established and run in Iraq? What about giving Abu Abbas a safe haven? What about providing safe haven for Abu Nidal? What about documentary evidence which links Iraq’s ambassador to Pakistan and Al Queda? I believe that it is clear that Saddam’s regime had links to terrorism and al Queda, a fact which is completely ignored by most of the press and almost all liberals. For more evidence you can read this article.

Finally, there is the entire issue of warrantless searches. The President’s position is that Congress authorized them when it authorized him to use “all necessary and appropriate force” in combatting terrorism. Furthermore, Senate Joint Resolution 23 allows the use of force against “those nations, organizations or persons” which the President determines committed attacks, or harbored, aided, planned or authorized past, present or future attacks against the United States. Sounds like Congress pretty much gave the President a blank check to do what ever he wishes.

Of course, there are members of Congress who say that we really didn’t mean all of this when we voted for it. If that is the case, then I believe that they are either lying or idiots. I suspect the latter. Now, don’t get me wrong, I believe that warrantless searches are unconstitutional; that they are a direct violation of the Fourth Amendment but, if that is the case then every senator and representative who voted for the resolution should be impeached. If not for “high crimes and misdemeanors” then for terminal stupidity.

5 Comments »

88

Comment by Veritas

March 25, 2006 @ 16:06

As to your third argument regarding the constitutionality of the warrantless searches of American citizens, I believe that it is not unconstitutional, per se, but rather one of those issues that the U.S. Supreme Court has yet to address directly. If you or your readers are interested, I have written on this issue on my site. I urge you to give it a read. The article is entitled, “Laws? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Laws!”

89

Comment by Doug

March 25, 2006 @ 16:24

Thanks.

I’ll take a look at your article. I believe that the language of the Fourth Amendment is pretty unambigious in that it states that “no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or Affirmation…”

91

Comment by J. Love

March 27, 2006 @ 8:11

Please note that warrantless surches in WW II occured all the time. The FBI simply broke in and searched.
When the country is in mortal danger, many things in the Constitution will be ignored. Your Dad

92

Comment by Doug

March 27, 2006 @ 17:32

Dad,

I know that warrantless searches were conducted by the FBI and other agencies during WWII. But, that does not make it constitutional. After all, Earl Warren ordered the internment of Japanese in California and that was a violation of the Constitution. At what point is the peril of great enough gravity to warrant unconstitutional measures? That is a question which remains unanswered.

95

Comment by J. Love

March 27, 2006 @ 21:31

I think that 3,000 plus peaceful Americans slaughtered, since it never happened before, is enough to do what ever it takes to see that it doesn’t happen again.
That includes listening in on RADIO transmissions from foreign countries with out asking anyone’s permission.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>